High-order Navier–Stokes · GPU
HAVA-HYPERFDX1
Time-accurate solver for hypersonic reacting flows with high-order schemes and on-the-fly rendering.
- ~30× vs multi-node CPU
- 300M grid points on one GPU
HAVA Laboratory · In-house codes
GPU-accelerated solvers for hypersonic, rarefied and reacting flows, from kinetic DSMC to high-order Navier–Stokes and stability analysis, together with the simulations and verification cases behind them.
High-order Navier–Stokes · GPU
Time-accurate solver for hypersonic reacting flows with high-order schemes and on-the-fly rendering.
Direct simulation Monte Carlo · GPU
Kinetic solver for rarefied and nonequilibrium flows: plumes, high-altitude aerothermodynamics and gas–surface interaction.
Linear stability · GPU
Stability solver for compressible flows that maps disturbance growth and transition-sensitive regions.
OpenFOAM-based · reacting flows
High-speed solver for compressible, reacting and hypersonic flows with detailed chemistry and adaptive mesh refinement.
Complex moving rarefied-flow structures at Mach 12 resolved on a desktop workstation with an RTX 4090.
HAVA-DSMCX1 resolving complex moving rarefied-flow structures at Mach 12. The simulation runs on a desktop workstation with an NVIDIA RTX 4090, capturing detailed flow physics at a fraction of the cost of conventional CPU-based DSMC implementations.
2 figures
Flow structure and stagnation-line profiles agree closely with the established SMILE DSMC solver.
Collision cross sections use the Variable Hard Sphere (VHS) and Variable Soft Sphere (VSS) models, and energy exchange between translational and internal modes uses the Larsen–Borgnakke approach, with relaxation rates from the Millikan–White and Parker models. The results are compared with the SMILE DSMC solver developed by the groups of Mikhail Ivanov and Sergey Gimelshein, and the two codes agree closely for this cylinder in thermal nonequilibrium.
Heat flux, surface pressure, velocity slip and temperature jump for a 4 km/s free stream at 68 km.
HAVA-DSMCX1 predicts a wide range of surface properties, including heat flux, surface pressure, velocity slip and temperature jump. The graphs show these quantities for a free-stream velocity of 4 km/s at an altitude of 68 km.
2 figures
Re-entry capsule flow at Mach 25 with adaptive mesh refinement concentrated at the shock.
Hypersonic re-entry flow at Mach 25 computed with HAVAFoam. Adaptive mesh refinement concentrates cells where the gradients are largest, such as the bow shock, keeping the cost down while preserving accuracy.
Viscous simulation of the Rutgers expansion tube facility.
A digital model of an expansion tube facility, simulated with HAVAFoam including viscous effects.
Time-accurate hypersonic cylinder flow on ~300 million grid points, run in under 15 hours on a single RTX 4090.
High-Reynolds-number hypersonic flow over a cylinder computed with HAVA-HYPERFDX1 on a mesh of approximately 300 million grid points. The simulation took less than 15 hours on a local PC equipped with an RTX 4090, and the flow field was rendered on the fly during the run, without separate post-processing.
Reproduces the dominant wake frequencies and Strouhal numbers of Prof. Shepherd's Mach 4 experiment at Caltech.
Supersonic flow over a cylinder at Mach 4 was investigated experimentally by Prof. Shepherd's group at Caltech, and HAVA-HYPERFDX1 was validated against the same case. The configuration is particularly challenging because the wake shows the onset of transition to turbulence. The solver reproduced the dominant wake frequencies and the corresponding Strouhal numbers, and the predicted surface quantities agree closely with our in-house OpenFOAM-based solver, which is about 30 times slower. Current work adds real-gas effects, thermochemical nonequilibrium models and wall models for LES.
2 figures
Stability maps of disturbance growth and decay for hypersonic flow over a flat plate.
Growth rates for hypersonic flow over a flat plate at Mach 6, computed with HAVA-STABLX1. The maps show where disturbances grow or decay across frequency and wavenumber, tracking the dominant instability modes.
2 figures
Comparison with existing stability data for Mach 4 and Mach 8 flows.
Validation and verification studies of HAVA-STABLX1 are ongoing. These graphs compare the computed results with existing data for Mach 4 and Mach 8 flows.
Nothing matches these filters.